
On October 6, 2024, Goa’s Governor assented to the Escheats, Forfeiture and Bona Vacantia Act, 2024—a legislative shift that fundamentally changes how property transfers when someone dies without a will or identifiable heirs. For high-net-worth individuals and NRIs holding significant assets in Goa, Escheats act is not academic law. This is a direct threat to generational wealth transfer unless you act now.
The mechanism is elegant in its severity: under Article 296 of the Indian Constitution, when an individual dies intestate and no legal heir can be identified, their property automatically vests in the state government. Goa has now codified this principle with procedural rigor. The government gains full ownership after holding the property for ten years, after which it may be sold. Families lose everything. No inheritance tax in India, but potentially complete asset forfeiture—the ultimate tax on planning failure.
This article examines the Act’s provisions, its implications for wealth preservation, and the strategic countermeasures that prudent investors must implement immediately.
The Goa Escheats, Forfeiture and Bona Vacantia Act, 2024 establishes a formal procedure for the state to take control of three categories of property:
Escheat. Property of a person who dies intestate without legal heirs passes automatically to the government. This applies regardless of the size of the estate or the length of time the property remained “ownerless.”
Forfeiture. Property seized by the state for breach of law or violation of Act provisions.
Bona Vacantia. Property without a clear owner—abandoned, mislaid, or unclaimed—becomes government property. The distinction from escheat is subtle but important: escheat is automatic; bona vacantia requires administrative determination.
The Act applies to all immovable and movable property within Goa’s jurisdiction, including properties held by NRIs, OCIs, and even foreign-resident Indians.
The Act establishes a “Competent Authority” to manage claims. If someone believes they are a legal heir, they can file a claim within a statutory period. The Competent Authority has four months to investigate and decide. Aggrieved parties may appeal within three months. Income from escheated property is held in government treasury until claims are resolved.
This sounds fair. In practice, it shifts the burden entirely to claimants. A potential heir living abroad—a common scenario for Goan diaspora investing in heritage properties—must navigate Indian administrative procedures from a distance, produce documentation, and prove legitimacy. The clock ticks. Deadlines pass. Property transfers to the state.
The Act provides immunity to the government from lawsuits arising from its administration of escheated property. Essentially, there is no recourse if the process fails.
Goa’s property market in 2025 is booming. NRI investment now comprises 25-30% of the luxury market. Tourism reached 54 lakh visitors in H1 2025.
Wealth is concentrating here. And so is the risk of careless succession planning.
Goa attracts a particular type of investor: successful professionals and entrepreneurs who buy property as a lifestyle asset, not a business. They often view estate planning as unnecessary friction. They assume their children will handle things. They delay creating wills. Some explicitly avoid wills to maintain informal flexibility or to hide assets from scrutiny.
This is a miscalculation of dangerous proportions.
For NRIs inheriting property in Goa, additional layers of complexity emerge:
FEMA Compliance. NRIs must adhere to the Foreign Exchange Management Act when inheriting property. The rules permit inheritance, but the process requires documentation and sometimes RBI approval, particularly if the property is subsequently sold and proceeds are repatriated.
TDS and Capital Gains. NRIs selling inherited property in Goa must pay TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) at 20-30% + surcharge + cess and declare capital gains. The recent tax changes (12.5% LTCG without indexation post-July 2024) apply equally to NRIs.
Repatriation Limits. NRIs can repatriate sale proceeds, but process and timing matter. Incomplete documentation can delay or block repatriation, leaving funds trapped in India.
Unity of Inheritance and Overseas Asset Declaration. Goa courts now mandate that all worldwide assets be listed in inventory proceedings. An NRI with assets in multiple jurisdictions must navigate this coordination. Missing one jurisdiction can trigger claims of concealment, complicating the entire succession.
Succession disputes are among the most bitter, costliest, and longest-running in Indian courts. A property worth ₹5 crore can burn ₹1-2 crore in legal fees and lost time over ten years of litigation.
The Goa Bona Vacantia Act does not eliminate disputes—it formalizes the process by which they are resolved. If your will is ambiguous, or if multiple family members have competing claims, the Competent Authority becomes involved. The process becomes bureaucratic, slower, and less sympathetic to family nuance.
Anticipate disputes. Prevent them through clarity. Engage a succession lawyer at the outset, not after someone dies.
For UHNI individuals and NRIs, wealth is not confined to Goa. It is distributed across jurisdictions, currencies, and asset types. Succession planning must be equally global:
The cost of not planning: potentially crores in lost assets, litigation, and family conflict.
From the Goa government’s point of view, the Escheats Act is pragmatic. Thousands of properties have been abandoned over decades—colonial-era houses, inherited plots nobody claims. Rather than let these assets decay, the government can take control, manage them, and generate revenue through leasing or sale. The Act formalizes what the government could already do under constitutional authority.
The downside: well-intentioned heirs sometimes lose property due to administrative failures, not genuine lack of heirs.
The Act may incentivize wealthier individuals to move assets out of Goa—incorporating them into trusts in Mumbai, holding them through offshore structures, or simply divesting entirely. This could reduce local property values and investment. Early data suggests this has not yet occurred, but it bears watching.
Properties inherited from parents or grandparents are especially vulnerable if not formally documented. An older person may have owned property for 60+ years with incomplete original documents. When they die, their children may struggle to prove clear title, triggering administrative complications and potentially bona vacantia claims.
This law, though neutral in language, may disproportionately affect middle-class heirs (those without access to sophisticated legal counsel) relative to ultra-wealthy families (who have professional advisors managing succession). This is a concern for equity-minded observers, though not a reason for individuals to avoid protective measures.

Not necessarily, but it is at high risk. The Act applies to people who die “intestate and without leaving legal heirs according to his personal law.” Legal heirs are defined by succession law—spouse, children, parents, siblings, and descendants in a prescribed order. If you have cousins, parents, or siblings, they may be recognized as heirs. However, they must file claims within the statutory period and provide documentation. If they fail to do so, or if the Competent Authority determines the documentation insufficient, the property becomes bona vacantia. The safest approach: create a will naming specific beneficiaries, whether family or otherwise.
It isn’t legally compulsory, but it’s often a sensible move. A will made in your country of residence can be accepted by Goa courts, provided it has been validly executed and properly authenticated. That said, Goa follows the Portuguese Civil Code and has its own succession procedures, which can make things more complicated in practice. For this reason, many NRIs prefer to put a separate, Goa-specific will in place for their property in the state. If you do have more than one will, it’s important that they are carefully aligned so they don’t unintentionally override or contradict each other.
To an extent, yes. When a property is owned by a private company, it doesn’t automatically fall under the Bona Vacantia Act because the company is a separate legal entity and continues to exist even after a shareholder passes away. The issue tends to arise in closely held or single-shareholder companies. If the shareholder dies without a clear will or without succession provisions built into the company’s Articles of Association, the transfer of shares can get delayed or become uncertain. In such situations, control of the company may be questioned, even though the property itself does not pass to the State.
The Act itself doesn’t allow for any automatic extension if a deadline is missed. You can appeal a decision of the Competent Authority within the prescribed time, usually around three months. In some cases, courts may step in if there has been genuine hardship or procedural unfairness, but that depends entirely on the facts and the court’s discretion. It’s not something you can safely count on, which is why meeting the statutory timelines is always the safest approach.
Goa is becoming a premier destination for UHNI investment. Properties appreciate steadily. Rental income flows. The state is relatively stable and investment-friendly.
But without proper succession planning, all of it is at risk.
The Goa Escheats, Forfeiture and Bona Vacantia Act, 2024 is not designed to harm families. It is designed to ensure property does not simply disappear into limbo. However, it shifts the burden of proof to heirs. If you cannot clearly establish your identity as a legal heir within statutory timelines and produce required documentation, the government assumes control.
This is not a minor legal technicality. This is a threat to generational wealth transfer.
Your response should be decisive:
The cost: minimal. The benefit: your wealth passes to your chosen beneficiaries, not to the state.






